Chevenga...

Top
0% (0 votes)
Bottom
19% (4 votes)
Switch
38% (8 votes)
Whaaaat? Anything other than utterly egalitarian, are you kidding??
14% (3 votes)
I'm not voting as I read ak and that would be cheating
24% (5 votes)
TMI
0% (0 votes)
Other, detailed juicily in comment
5% (1 vote)
Total votes: 21

Comments

He's a leader,

...he's a commander, some might say he's a control freak and he likes to have his nose in everything... and none of you think he's a top? Eye-wink

Yeah

You don't think we know him as well as you do? Give your writing more credit. I tried to search the old blog for that "On Top of Chevenga..." ditty you posted, but I couldn't find it. I know your comment was just baiting...I just think we're smarter than you give us credit for Sticking out tongue

Baiting? Moi? (blink blink)

I'd never do such a thing.

Good Gods, of course my readers are smart.

But in all seriousness, I had heard the idea that publicly high-powered types have a tendency to be privately sexually submissive, and it made a lot of sense to me, because it's a balancing, a relief from constant responsibility. And of course I think it is cool, just as I think all quirkily-ironic ways of being human are cool, and fun to write about. Just now I wondered if I could Google up some substantiation.

Here is a newspaper article which talks about BDSM intelligently and without derision, and touches on this notion:

And, ironically, those you'd expect to wield the whips and paddles behind closed doors would often sooner be muzzled, flogged and nipple-clamped into submission, says [Calgary sexologist Tina] Read.

"The high-powered exec type or control freak outside the bedroom generally likes to have someone control them inside the bedroom," she says. "It's probably the one place they let themselves be vulnerable and open, and trust enough to lay down their guard."

Yet that is mere anecdotal evidence. Might there be a study about it? Ta da ...specifically about submissive men. The results suggest that, like auto-asphyxiation, it's not quite but almost exclusive to white guys, and there are some intriguing regional differences ("...there is something about New England that tends to create a disproportionate number of submissive men"). And:

Twenty-two percent own their own businesses while sixty-eight percent work for others. (Six percent are retired, one percent is unemployed and one percent keep house while the wife works). A whopping forty percent have employees for which they are the direct supervisor. I do not have benchmark against which to compare that, but I suspect that it is inordinately high compared to the population overall. Furthermore, forty-one percent consider their job “high-powered” and fully fifty-five percent consider their job high stress.

So there you have it. Not incontrovertible proof, and the author points out that we can't know the reason or even which way causality goes from the correlation, but a strong correlation.

With Chevenga, however, it's more complicated (as it always is with him) in that his high-powered job is framed culturally as submissive, and he's been strictly trained to that. You'll see that contradiction come more into play (in non-sexual contexts) as things go. He's actually about to be told pointedly that he has more power than he's really supposed to, maybe in today's post; we'll see how it goes.

Just to warn you guys, I'm not going to just give the answer to this quiz when I close the poll once voting has plateau'ed out. You'll just have to keep reading, until you find it tidily answered in a certain chapter of asa kraiya.

And that last line is why

And that last line is why I've already read asa kraiya. I'm waaay too impatient to wait!

Also because I found ak first, and only then started reading PiA simultaneously Eye-wink

Yeah, the way I have it set up now

...you can't possibly start reading ak without knowing it's a sequel to PA and has major spoilers. I was mostly thinking of my old audience when I put together the old sites, and ak was foremost in my mind, and heart, to present. But then the new audience took over, and of course I want the new audience to really take over.

"Tops" being Bottoms...

Someone was just telling me it's the executive types who enjoy being bottoms in S&M... Eye-wink

-GreenGlass

Top has been effectively eliminated . . .

based on that last time with Niku. Bottom or switch appear to be the remaining options.

Also, I am given to understand that those who are controlling in public, or professionally, might prefer to surrender that control in the bedroom. It's not universal, by any means, but I'm told there is some tendency.

--Light (who's still not sure why his is the only "other" vote)

Yeah, but that might just have been

...for relationship-preservation reasons. Bedroom diplomacy, shall we say. People do sometimes act outside their inclinations for practical reasons...

Heck no

Sometimes, yes. Generally? Something this personal, this intimate? No.

I think it's more yin-yang. When we tend towards one side, society and its expectations over time can entrap or force us further to that side. There's a natural reaction which can't be expressed in public.

Too much yin and you're gonna end up taking it in the yang Eye-wink

That last line

...is so worth quoting.

Well he doesn't seem to be

Well he doesn't seem to be all that in control of his love life right now...!

Chevenga:

"Rip. Hair. Rip. Hair. Rip. Hair."

Well, maybe not all /that/ juicy.

And maybe I'm over-analyzing things, but I don't think that Chevenga could top anyone (at least not yet; maybe if/when he completes the interrupted therapy). I also don't think he can accept being bottom to a man (with the same proviso).

So I'm going to say occasional bottom to women; utterly egalitarian otherwise.

--Light

Bookmark Us

Bookmark Website 
Bookmark Page